by CKR
“Recommendations for the Nuclear Weapons Complex of the Future,” the draft report of the Nuclear Weapons Complex Infrastructure Task Force of the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB), gets a lot of things right in a world that may not exist.
SEAB was asked by the House of Representatives to take a look at the nuclear weapons complex: how it might be streamlined and improved to support a smaller nuclear stockpile for the 1700-2200 operationally deployed nuclear weapons anticipated by the Treaty of Moscow. That means two to three times that number of weapons for the total, with non-deployed spares, backups, and weapons in various stages of production and dismantlement.
The report fulfills its charge with a relentless and salutory logic: putting all the fissionable material at one site makes sense; consolidating all nuclear weapons manufacture at that site makes sense; good numbers are given for capacities and time requirements; improved manufacturing methods are outlined.
The task force’s vision of a single nuclear weapons production site that handles all fissionable material includes plutonium and highly enriched uranium foundries along with other metalworking facilities; a materials research, analytical chemistry, and production development laboratory; and a plant for for producing, machining and testing insensitive high explosives, a weapons assembly and disassembly hall; a plutonium and pit storage facility; a storage area for highly enriched uranium and secondary canned assemblies; a secure shipping and receiving facility; storage for non-nuclear components; and an environmental reclamation and waste recovery facility. The report is at a conceptual level, but it sketches a budget and timeline.
But a few points are neglected: how to fix the organizational problems that now cripple the design labs and will make transformation impossible within the report’s timeline, and the political responses to locating a plant that machines plutonium and high explosives and can be expected to be a terrorist magnet as well as to removing functions and therefore jobs from existing plants.
Continue reading "The Draft Nuclear Weapons Complex Report" »
Recent Comments